However, the SCA found that at the time the bank abandoned the debt, nothing could be divested, as GD Brews had to pay the debts in accordance with its agreement with Brayton and JP Brews. From a legal point of view, the transfer by transfer of a non-existent right is a nullity. The SCA also reviewed the authorized correspondence between the bank`s lawyers and the lawyers for LA DG Brews. It concluded that the parties clearly intended to transfer its full payment request to the bank. GD Brews attempted to amend its claim by stating that the assignment was a precondition for payment, but the Tribunal in particular dismissed this attempt as inconsistent with the assignment. This is a release or release.  France ceded Louisiana to the United States by the Treaty of Paris on April 30, 1803. Spain made a surrender of East and West Florida by treaty of February 22, 1819. From New York, Virginia, Massachusetts, Connecticut, South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia made several crossings of part of their territory. Even if a debt were property within the meaning of Section 134, the non-cedendo pactum would prevent the lifeguard from transferring the accounting debts without the bank`s consent. Section 134 (3) does not apply to a standard transfer of accounting debts, since the definition of “guarantee” in Section 1 of the Insolvency Act is “the property of an estate over which the creditor has a prerogative because of a particular mortgage, the lender`s legal assumption, the deposit or the right of withholding.
The transfer taker in this type of assignment is not required to inform the debtors of the transferor. The transfer director only holds this assignment as collateral, the cleared accounting debts are constantly replaced by new ones. In Grobbelaar/Oosthuizen 2009 (5) SA 500 (SCA), the Tribunal found that in the event of a transfer of rights, the assignor would lose all rights by issuing these rights to an assignee and, after the transfer, nothing would remain in the transferor (see item 8). This decision was supported by Kritzinger and Another/Standard Bank of South Africa (3034/2013)  ZAFFHS 215 (September 19, 2013) (Kritzinger case). We believe it is clear that health professionals should not legitimately suspend the transfer of accounting debts (or, in this case, any security rights that a bank may enjoy). We believe that it is not unpleasant for a practitioner to withdraw the accounting debts of the company`s debtors from the company`s bank account from the transfer bank and then use the proceeds to pay the company`s operating and rescue costs. However, it is completely inappropriate for the practitioner to redirect the funds recovered by the debtors to a bank account with another bank. As a general rule, the transfer of accounting debt is done in the sense of an unsecured transfer. The construction of the deposit is only respected if the possibility of a security transfer is expressly excluded. There are two theories on the transfer of security, the theory of deposit and a sloping assignment with the obligation to recover (reversion rights). In other words, the rescuer must not surrender or incriminate property without the agreement of the secured creditor, unless the proceeds are sufficient to appease the secured creditor`s debt and are effectively paid to him immediately.